NAV Loans Unlocked: Navigating Risk and Opportunity - Part 2
In Part 1, we broke down the mechanics, market dynamics, and rapid rise of NAV loans—now projected to exceed USD 600 – 700 billion by 2030.
In Part 2, we turn to the implications: how GPs are using NAV financing, what LPs need to watch for, and the governance frameworks required to manage the growing risks.
From leverage-on-leverage dynamics to alignment pitfalls, here’s what every LP should know before the next fund update.
“Leverage is the only way a smart guy can go broke.”
– Warren Buffett, at the 2010 Berkshire Hathaway Annual Shareholders Meeting
Key takeaways
1) NAV loans offer powerful, but risky, flexibility. For GPs, they enable asset retention, M&A, and smoother distributions. For LPs, they introduce layered leverage, cross-collateralisation, and alignment challenges.
2) Transparency and alignment are make-or-break. LPs must demand clear communication on rationale, use of proceeds, and terms—particularly to guard against misuse tied to carry acceleration or underperforming assets.
3) Governance is the LP’s defensive playbook. From LPAC oversight to stronger LPA language and targeted due diligence, proactive governance is essential to ensure NAV loans enhance long-term value – not erode it.
The Double-Edged Sword: Advantages and Disadvantages
NAV loans, like many financial tools, present both opportunities and challenges. Their impact varies depending on the perspective – whether viewed by the GP managing the fund or the LPs invested in it.
The GP Perspective: Flexibility and Firepower
For GPs, the burgeoning NAV loan market offers a valuable expansion of their financing toolkit. It provides a potentially cost-effective and flexible means to access capital, particularly when traditional avenues like exits or further capital calls are constrained.
Advantages for GPs include
- Enhanced Liquidity: Proceeds can fund value-accretive activities such as add-on acquisitions for portfolio companies, support organic growth initiatives, or even refinance more expensive debt at the company level.
- Strategic Flexibility: NAV loans allow GPs to manage portfolios more dynamically, potentially holding high-performing assets longer to maximise value rather than being forced into premature sales.
- Efficient Capital Management: In some cases, using a NAV facility can help GPs deploy capital more efficiently, potentially enabling funds to become fully invested and maximise returns on committed capital.
- Distribution Management: In certain circumstances, NAV loans can be used to accelerate distributions to LPs, addressing liquidity needs without immediate asset sales.
However, GPs must also navigate potential downsides. Raising NAV debt adds complexity and requires careful structuring and negotiation. Crucially, GPs face increasing expectations from LPs regarding transparency and justification for using such facilities.
The LP Perspective: Potential Gains, Heightened Risks
For LPs, the assessment is more nuanced. While NAV loans can theoretically enhance returns if used prudently by the GP for value creation, they introduce significant risks that require careful consideration.
Potential Advantages for LPs
- Return Enhancement: If loan proceeds are deployed effectively into high-returning opportunities (e.g., strategic add-ons), overall fund returns could be boosted.
- Smoother Distributions: In slow exit markets, NAV loans might provide LPs with desired liquidity sooner than otherwise possible.
- GP Flexibility: Allowing GPs flexibility can be beneficial if it leads to better long-term portfolio management decisions.
Disadvantages and Risks for LPs
- Increased Leverage: NAV loans add a layer of debt at the fund level on top of existing leverage within portfolio companies, creating a ‘leverage-on-leverage’ effect that magnifies potential losses.
- Cross-Collateralisation Risk: This is arguably the most significant risk. Unlike company-level debt, a NAV loan is typically secured against the entire portfolio. Distress in one part of the portfolio could potentially jeopardise the whole fund’s equity value if covenants are breached.
- Potential Misalignment: Concerns exist that GPs might use NAV loans for purposes not fully aligned with LP interests, such as artificially boosting NAV to reach a preferred return hurdle and trigger carried interest payments, or propping up underperforming assets.
- Complexity and Opacity: The terms of NAV loans can be complex, making it challenging for LPs to fully assess the risks and implications without adequate transparency from the GP.
- Impact on Distributions: While sometimes used to accelerate distributions, the loan itself needs servicing and repayment, which could impact the timing and quantum of future distributions.
Understanding both sides of this equation is crucial for all private market participants navigating the rise of NAV financing.
Figure 1: Illustrative Common Use Cases for NAV Loans
Understanding the Risks: Leverage, Complexity, and Alignment
While NAV loans offer strategic advantages, LPs and GPs must carefully evaluate the inherent risks. These facilities introduce complexities and potential conflicts that demand rigorous scrutiny.
Cross-Collateralisation: The Systemic Threat
Perhaps the most fundamental risk introduced by NAV loans is cross-collateralisation. Unlike traditional private equity leverage, which is typically confined to individual portfolio companies, NAV loans are secured against a pool of assets.
This means an idiosyncratic issue or severe underperformance in one company could potentially trigger covenants or default clauses affecting the entire loan, putting the equity value of otherwise healthy assets within the fund at risk.
As Neuberger Berman highlights, this introduces a layer of systemic risk not present with company-level debt alone.
Leverage on Leverage: Magnifying Exposure
Critics often point to the ‘leverage on leverage’ concern. NAV financing adds debt at the fund level, sitting atop the existing debt structures within the underlying portfolio companies.
While the LTV ratios for NAV loans themselves might appear conservative (often 5-30%), the overall leverage profile of the fund’s investments increases. This amplified leverage can enhance returns in positive scenarios but significantly magnifies losses during downturns.
Valuation Sensitivity and Market Volatility
NAV loans are intrinsically linked to the valuation of the underlying portfolio. Accurate and reliable NAV reporting is crucial.
In volatile markets, NAVs can decline, potentially breaching LTV covenants and triggering cash sweeps or defaults. The methodologies used for valuing illiquid private assets become even more critical when fund-level debt relies upon them.
Furthermore, as most NAV loans carry floating interest rates, rising rates increase the cost of servicing the debt, potentially eroding fund returns and impacting cash flows available for distribution or reinvestment.
Alignment of Interests: A Critical Checkpoint
A significant concern for LPs revolves around the potential for misalignment between GP and LP interests. While GPs may present NAV loans as tools for value creation, LPs must question the primary motivation.
Is the loan genuinely for strategic acquisitions or portfolio support, or could it be used to accelerate carried interest payments for the GP by artificially boosting distributions or NAV, even if not optimal for long-term LP value? The use of proceeds requires careful examination.
Complexity and Transparency Gaps
NAV loan structures and terms can be complex and opaque. LPs may struggle to fully grasp the implications without detailed disclosure and clear communication from the GP.
Understanding the specific covenants, security packages, recourse provisions, and potential impact on the fund’s distribution waterfall is essential but often requires deep technical expertise, transparent reporting, and sufficient time, which may not always be forthcoming.
The LP Playbook: Navigating NAV Loans Strategically
As NAV financing becomes more prevalent, LPs need a clear strategy to assess and monitor its use by their GPs. Proactive engagement and rigorous due diligence are essential to protect LP interests.
Demand Transparency and Clear Communication
Openness from the GP is paramount. LPs should expect, and demand, clear communication regarding any contemplated or existing NAV facility.
This includes the fundamental rationale – the “what” and the “why” – behind the loan. GPs must articulate how the facility aligns with the fund’s strategy and how it is expected to benefit LPs, not just the management company.
As Neuberger Berman advises, communication should extend beyond mere notification; it requires real-time candour throughout the origination process. LPs are partners and dislike learning about significant fund-level leverage after the fact.
Leverage Governance Structures
Formal governance mechanisms play a critical role. Newer fund vintages increasingly include specific language in LPAs regarding the use and limitations of NAV finance. LPs should pay close attention to these clauses during fund negotiations.
LPACs are key forums for discussion and, in some cases, approval. LPs, particularly those on LPACs, should use these platforms to probe GPs on their NAV financing plans and ensure proper oversight.
Partners Group notes the trend towards clearer LPA language and LPAC engagement as positive steps towards better alignment.
Key Due Diligence Questions for GPs
When a GP proposes using a NAV loan, LPs should ask targeted questions
- Purpose & Rationale: Why is this facility needed now? What specific objective does it achieve (e.g., specific acquisition, liquidity need)? How does it align with the fund strategy?
- Use of Proceeds: Exactly how will the capital be deployed? Is it for offensive value creation or defensive shoring up?
- Terms & Structure: What are the key terms (LTV, interest rate, maturity, covenants, security package)? Is the pricing competitive? How flexible is the structure?
- Risk Assessment: What are the key risks (cross-collateralisation, leverage, valuation sensitivity)? What mitigants are in place (e.g., asset quality, covenant headroom)?
- Alignment: How does this benefit LPs? How does it impact the GP’s carried interest and the overall waterfall? Are there potential conflicts?
- Reporting & Monitoring: How will the facility and its impact be reported to LPs?
Identifying Red Flags
Certain scenarios should raise concerns for LPs:
- Lack of transparency or reluctance from the GP to discuss the facility openly.
- Using loan proceeds primarily to hit preferred return hurdles or accelerate GP carry.
- Employing NAV loans to bail out struggling portfolio companies without a clear path to recovery.
- Excessively high LTV ratios or particularly onerous terms.
- Vague justifications for the loan or its intended use.
Strategic Considerations for LPs
The use of NAV finance has broader implications. LPs may need to adjust their capital pacing models to account for the potential impact on capital calls and distributions.
Furthermore, when assessing manager performance, LPs should consider the impact of fund-level leverage, potentially looking beyond headline IRR figures to understand returns on an absolute or unlevered basis where appropriate.
Given the complexity of NAV loans LPs would also be well advised to to work together with other LPs in the same fund. In this way they can potentially pool their expertise, move faster, and can act together, giving them, if needed, some more leverage, pun intended, towards the GP.
The Future Outlook: Continued Growth and Evolution
The rapid ascent of NAV financing within private equity shows no signs of slowing. Industry participants widely expect continued, significant growth, transforming it from a niche product into a more mainstream component of the fund finance toolkit.
Sustained Market Expansion
The underlying drivers fuelling demand – the sheer scale of the private equity industry, potentially longer holding periods in uncertain exit markets, and the ongoing need for liquidity and strategic capital – are likely to persist. As Partners Group notes, a significant volume of funds will enter their mature phases, precisely when NAV facilities become most relevant.
Projections point towards a market potentially reaching USD 600-700 billion or more by 2030. While NAV finance currently represents a small fraction of total private equity AUM, its penetration is expected to increase substantially, possibly mirroring the widespread adoption of subscription lines over the past decade.
Product Innovation and Sophistication
As the market matures, we can expect further innovation in NAV financing structures. Lenders are developing more bespoke solutions tailored to specific GP needs and portfolio characteristics, moving beyond standard senior loans to include preferred equity and other hybrid instruments.
While the current focus is largely on buyout funds, the application of NAV-based principles may continue to expand across other private market asset classes.
Expanding Geographical Reach
Initially more established in Europe, NAV financing has gained significant traction in North America more recently, as highlighted by 17Capital/Oaktree. This geographical expansion is likely to continue, potentially extending further into Asian markets as awareness and acceptance grow globally.
Increased Scrutiny and the Importance of Prudence
Alongside growth will come increased scrutiny. Limited Partners are becoming more sophisticated in their understanding and questioning of NAV facilities, demanding greater transparency and robust governance from GPs.
While significant regulatory intervention specific to NAV loans seems unlikely in the near term, the broader focus on private market leverage and transparency could indirectly influence practices. Responsible usage, clear communication, and strong alignment between GPs and LPs will be crucial for the market’s sustainable development.
NAV financing is unlocking new possibilities in private equity portfolio management. However, its power must be wielded with prudence, ensuring that this evolving tool ultimately serves to enhance long-term value for investors.
Stay Illiquid!
Kasper
Sources
- Neuberger Berman. (February 2024). A Perspective on Private Equity NAV Loans.
- Pemberton. (February 2024). NAV Financing – Evolution within Fund Financing
- Oaktree Capital Management. (March 2024) NAV Finance 101: The Next Generation of Private Capital
- 17Capital. (March 2024). NAV Finance 101: The Next Generation of Private Credit
Partners Group. (January 2025). Fund finance: NAV financing unlocked
More Insights
Insights
Sign up to keep up to date with the latest news and updates.
© 2025 Balentic ApS. CVR: 44034255. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy | Terms of Service
The Balentic website and Orca are, and are expected to continue to be, under development. Consequently, some of the features described in this Overview and/or on the website may not yet be available or may work differently. Some features may furthermore not be available to all users.